icampushelp  
head_image

course descriptonprofessorsyllabuscalendarunit1unit2unit3unt4unit5unit6part1part2part3part4weblinksreadingsassigmentsunit7unit8logo
Globalization > Unit 6 > Part 3

Unit 6: Financial Crisis, the IMF, and the World Bank

Part 3: The International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Prior to WI, foreign exchange markets were relatively uneventful. Currency values were defined in accordance with the Gold Standard, which guaranteed (as discussed in Unit 5) fixed exchange rates between the participating nations. After the war, however, the system collapsed as countries began printing money to pay for the war and tried to stimulate their economies by devaluing their currencies in an attempt to sell more exports. Increased uncertainty over exchange rates and the newly erected protectionist policies brought the global economy to a standstill.

The Bretton Woods conference. Towards the end of WWII, the Bretton Woods conference convened, hoping to establish, among other things, a new international monetary system. The “Bretton Woods” system that emerged was a modified variation of the previous Gold Standard. The value of the U.S. dollar was fixed in terms of gold, and all other currencies were assigned exchange values in terms of U.S. dollars—effectively linking them to gold as well. The U.S. agreed to maintain the value of the dollar at $35 per ounce of gold, and the other nations agreed to maintain the value of their currencies within one percent of their assigned values through central bank intervention in the foreign exchange markets. According to the agreement, countries could only alter their official exchange rates with the consent of a newly created institution, the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, whose primary purpose was to promote stability within the system.

Source: http://web.singnet.com.sg/~mielbox/welcome13.html

Emerge of IMF. By the early 1970s, however, the fixed exchange rate system of Bretton Woods had become unmanageable due to the constraints it placed on the U.S.’s ability to grow its money supply, which (as you will recall from Unit 5) was necessary to sustain global economic growth. In 1973 the Bretton Woods system was officially disbanded and countries began to allow their currencies to freely float. As such, the role of the IMF was forced to change too. Today, the IMF monitors the exchange-rate policies of member nations. It collects information on the state of the nation’s economy and recommends changes when a nation engages in practices that could undermine future international debt payments and stability. If a member nation cannot meet its international obligations, then, ultimately,
the IMF serves as its lender of “last resort.”

How the IMF works. IMF member nations, which account for most of the world’s GDP, contribute an annual payment, called a “quota subscription,” which provides the IMF with the funds necessary to make emergency loans to member nations experiencing financial difficulty. Each member nation can withdraw 25% of the quota that it paid in the form of gold or a convertible currency. Larger sums can be borrowed from the IMF if the country provides an acceptable plan for eliminating the problems that brought on the crisis. These reform plans generally include:

  • a reduction in government spending
  • a more stringent monetary policy
  • the privatization of inefficient public enterprises
  • related “market-oriented” reforms
The decisions the IMF makes are based on “voting rights,” which are allocated on the basis of the size of the quota subscription. The U.S. has the largest quota subscription, followed by many other large developed nations. This bias in voting rights is a common criticism of the IMF. Critics claim the IMF is largely a puppet controlled by wealthy nations and large corporations, whose interests don’t easily coincide with the developing world.

Some see the IMF as a Trojan horse.

Source: http://www.narmada.org/a16-dc/snaps/imf.trojan.horse.jpg

 

VIDEO: Criticism of the IMF

 

Debate about the usefulness of the IMF. During more recent years, crises in Latin America and Southeast Asia have resulted in substantial debate over the usefulness of the IMF. Supporters of the IMF argue that its actions prevented these problems from becoming more severe. Critics, on the other hand, argue that the availability of these “bailout” funds create a moral hazard, encouraging those in power to take huge risks, often burdening the layperson who can least afford it.

Critics also argue that the stringent reforms demanded by the IMF—and the wealthy western nations which dominate its decision making—as a condition for loans is tantamount to an infringement of national autonomy. And nations, when faced with the prospect of such restrictions, will hesitate to accept IMF loans, causing fixable problems to become full blown crises. To fully appreciate the magnitude of the disagreement surrounding the IMF, consider the following quotes and click on the links to read the paper and speech from which they are taken:

The legitimate political institutions of the country should determine the nation’s economic structure and the nature of its institutions. A nation’s desperate need for short-term financial help does not give the IMF the moral right to substitute its technical judgments for the outcomes of the nation’s political process.

         —Martin Feldstein, Professor of Economics, Harvard University, and President of the
             National Bureau of Economic Research

Refocusing the IMF: http://www.nber.org/feldstein/fa0398.html

There in neither point nor excuse for the international community to provide financial assistance to a country unless that country takes measures to prevent future such crises.

       —Stanley Fischer, Professor of Economics, MIT, and First Managing Director of the IMF

Download the PDF version of The IMF and the Asian Crisis here.

VIDEO: The IMF and the Asian Crisis

 

WEBLINK: For additional information on the IMF and the IMF's response to its critics visit:

What is the IMF and Common Criticisms of the IMF

WEBLINK: To read additional debates by leading economists on the pros and cons of the IMF, visit this article by the Hoover Institution:

Abolish the IMF?


Millennium: The IMF in the New Century
The International Monetary Fund is evolving as a global financial institution to meet the economic challenges of the 21st century. Following the devastation of World War II, the IMF was established to foster economic stability and promote peace. Now at the dawn of a new century, the IMF provides member nations with advice and loans to help them build better lives for their people. This documentary style video, which helps viewers understand the world monetary system, is presented in four stand-alone segments. "Out of the Ashes" – the IMF’s origins; "Keeping Track" – IMF oversight of the global economy; "The Sum of Its Parts – How the IMF Lends" – financial assistance to member nations and "Korea: Conquering a Crisis" – IMF assistance to Korea following the Asia crisis.

VIDEO CLIPS: For some short video clips produced by the IMF watch:
Use the link below and scroll down to the Millennium: The IMF in the New Century section http://www.imf.org/external/mmedia/index.asp

 

 

 

 

All files © Copyright 2010 UNCG DCL
Please report any problems or errors to the Site Admin
Our Privacy Policy

 
 
foot